Head Line: Over The Barrel: How to boost the energy drive
1) Mains Paper III: Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization, of resources, growth, development and employment.
- India faces a variety of challenges related to energy and environment. Here are some initiatives that the next government could contemplate early on its term.
A blueprint of initiatives for energy:
- One, integrate energy and environment policy.
- The various ministries currently engaged with energy and the environment should be collapsed into one omnibus Ministry of Energy and Environment.
- This will perforate the current siloed approach to energy policy and enable the new government to view the sector through an integrated and holistic lens.
- It could more easily track and evaluate the systemic implications of changes in any one or more component variable.
- Two, an “Energy and Environment Security Act” should be passed.
- The objective of such an act should be:
- to bring energy and environment into the national narrative;
- to set out the road map for managing and mitigating the emergent challenge of balancing economic development and energy demands with the goal of environmental protection;
- and, to mobilise public support for the policy and regulatory changes required to hasten the transition to a non-fossil fuel based energy system.
- Three, creation of energy data centre.
- Energy data is scattered across various government departments. This hinders policy and investment.
- The new government should establish an integrated energy data centre, whose data should be regularly updated and made available to all players on commercial terms.
- Four, decarbonisation, demand management and efficiency.
- These should be the watchwords of the new government’s energy policy.
- In this context, the focus should be on generating electricity from solar and wind, incentivising electric vehicles, curtailing diesel consumption in agriculture, enforcing standards and emission norms, redesigning buildings and factories to make them carbon neutral and influencing behavioural change towards energy conservation.
- A multi-pronged thrust along these lines will weaken the current unhealthy relationship between economic growth, energy demand and the environment.
- Additionally, the “clean energy fund” which is currently funded through a cess on coal production and is managed by the ministry of finance should be augmented through the issuance of “green bonds” and a clean energy tax.
- This is to intensify research and development on clean energy technologies (battery storage, carbon capture and sequestration, hydrogen, coal gasification, modular nuclear reactors, etc.) and to fund the transmission and distribution infrastructure required for absorbing the flow of clean energy.
- Its loci of administration should be handed over to those with domain expertise.
- This to safeguard the funds from sequestration into the consolidated fund and to ensure that the conditions are created for incubating innovation, and forging international R&D and technology partnerships.
- Five, energy diplomacy.
- The levers of energy and, in particular, oil policy, are today in the hands of autocratic leaders.
- This “personalisation” of energy politics would not have been an issue in the past when oil was traded mostly against long-term supply contracts.
- But today, against the backdrop of an integrated, liquid and fungible market characterised by short-term flexible supply deals, this is of relevance especially for import-dependent countries like India.
- The local actions of leaders now have global, supply-related ramifications.
- The new government should, therefore, look to develop a specialised cadre of “energy diplomats.”
- It should contemplate lateral entrants at mid- and senior levels of government with relevant domain and international expertise.
- It should unshackle the energy public sector units from intrusive bureaucratic oversight to enable their management to respond with agility to unexpected market developments.
- And it should establish strong personal relations with the leaders of oil exporting states.
- At a crunch time, the latter could be the peg on which will hang India’s supply security.
- Six, intensify exploration and enhance recovery.
- India’s unattractive geology is the reason why the various bidding rounds for private sector investment in oil and gas exploration have not been a success.
- The new government should not stop this effort but it should consider three changes to the current contract terms.
- One, it should replace the current revenue-sharing model with a production-sharing model for new exploration.
- Two, it should link investment in the marginal and smaller discovered fields with access to the domestic retail market and remove the condition that only companies that have invested Rs 2,000 crore will be eligible for a marketing licence.
- Three, it should contemplate bidding out Mumbai High and other major producing oil and gas fields to international players with proven enhanced oil recovery technologies. The current recovery rates of production from these fields are well below the global average.
- Seven, increase competition.
- Coal India Limited (CIL) is a major producer of coal but faces huge legacy issues (labour unions, mafia, politics and organisation) which constrain its ability to fully and efficiently harness the country’s indigenous coal reserves.
- These issues cannot be addressed without first redrawing the contours of India’s political economy.
- The new government cannot, understandably, tackle these issues early on in its tenure.
- It can, however, resurrect an earlier decision to allow private sector companies into commercial coal mining.
- The consequent pressure of competition will bear positively on the performance of CIL.
- Eight, natural gas.
- This has also not realised its full potential.
- Five early initiatives should be contemplated.
- First, Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) should be unbundled into a monopoly gas pipeline company. It should be divested of its upstream (production/ re-gassification of LNG) and downstream (petrochemicals) operations. These can be merged into one or more of the existing PSUs.
- Second, the “common access” principle must be fairly enforced. Every player, private or public, must have equal access to gas pipelines.
- Third, the price of gas should be determined on the basis of market and competitive principles. This principle should apply across the gas value chain, except pipeline transport tariffs which should be linked to return on capital.
- Fourth, a gas trading hub should be expeditiously established.
- The objective of such an act should be:
- Finally, special energy courts should be established to expedite adjudication of disputes and ensure sanctity of contracts.
- The latter have been major deterrents to investment in the energy sector.
Head Line: More crop per drop: Can Punjab arrest its slide into desertification?
2) Mains Paper III: Major crops-cropping patterns in various parts of the country, - different types of irrigation and irrigation systems storage
- As depleting groundwater pushes Punjab towards turning into a desert in the next 25 years, the ruling government in the state is eager to push drip irrigation.
- But even a decade after drip and sprinkler irrigation system was introduced in Punjab in 2006-07, the state has not even managed to extend it to one per cent of its area under cultivation.
- Add to it the grip of wheat-paddy cropping cycle on the state’s agrarian economy.
Total area under Micro Irrigation in Punjab:
- Around 83 per cent (nearly 42 lakh hectares) of the total 50,362 square km area of Punjab is under agricultural and horticultural crops cultivation.
- Currently, 33,711 hectares is covered under MI (drip and Sprinkler irrigation system), which is just 0.7 per cent of the total cultivable land of the state.
What is the MI scheme?
- The MI scheme is running in all the 22 districts of Punjab and is mainly adopted for vegetables (19119 hectares) and Citrus crops (8617 hectares) besides other fruits, Sugarcane, Cotton, Maize, pulses, sunflower, and wheat fodder.
- It was a scheme sponsored by the Centre and launched in 2006-07, with Centre and state sharing 60:40 ratio of total 80 per cent subsidy.
- In 2015-16, Centre launched ‘Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY)’ and subsumed MI National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) under ‘Per Drop More Crop’ and also reduced its subsidy over the years.
- But Punjab Government made sure that the subsidy amount up to 80 per cent to general farmers and 90 per cent to small/marginal farmers and SC/Women for installation to MI system.
- The cost of installation is Rs 1.25 to 1.50 lakh per acre.
- The subsidy is 80 per cent of the cost, and the life of the MI is around 20 years with nominal maintenance charges.
- Experts say that despite heavy subsidy, area under MI has remained low as farmers are getting 100 per cent ‘power subsidy’ and growing paddy crop on a huge area.
Why does Punjab need drip irrigation?
- According to Central Ground Water Board report Punjab’s water has gone down to 200 to 300 mts at several places and due to over exploitation of ground water in 109 out of total 138 Agricultural Blocks.
- The state will become a desert in coming 25 years.
- Punjab has failed to divert land away from paddy, which is grown on 25 lakh hectares out of total 30 lakh hectare under rice, to other crops in past two decades even by launching ‘contract farming’ in 2002 and “New Diversification’ policy in 2012-13.
- In such a scenario, drip irrigation, which irrigates crop ‘drop by drop’, is the best method against the traditional flood irrigation system.
According to the Soil Conservation department of Punjab MI techniques can save 40 per cent to 80 per cent of water and ‘Water Use Efficiency’ (WUE) can be enhanced up to 100 per cent in a properly designed and managed MI system compared to 30-40 per cent under traditional methods.